I didn’t necessarily “attend” the iPhone 5 release speech in
San Francisco the other month, but I did watch a live broadcast, so I think
that counts for something. Also, it should be noted, I’m not a huge apple fan
boy – I have an Android – but there’s always so much buzz and controversy about
the release that I felt compelled to watch it. Apple products are famous, in
part, for their aesthetics, so it’s only natural that their release would
coalesce striking visual media into the unveiling. While the speaker did a
great job of communicating the significance of each innovative tweak, the media
offered elements the speech couldn’t: aesthetic appeal and visual examples of
how the new features worked. The media set the tone for the release. It was
smooth, slick, futuristic, and minimalist. As the speaker went through his
speech, the media changed to reflect the topics. Sometimes it was just a static
image of the new phone and other times it was animated. The screen would
display a virtual menu and would go through new programs and features just as
the consumer would when the phone was available for purchase. The effectiveness
of this process was the only distraction. I know that sounds contradictory, but
what I mean to say is that the media was so interesting and pertinent to the
speech that it was hard to decide which to pay attention to, the screen or the
speech. I didn’t see much room for improvement as far as presentation goes.
Apple always does well with presentation! Whether it be this type of event, print ads, or commercials. In any case, I think it was mostly positive that the visual was so interesting to the viewer. Obviously if the viewer cannot even focus on what is being said that is going to be an issue, but I think people often have the issue of visual aids just being completely distracting and not helpful or interesting at all. That obviously wasn't the case with this. When the viewer can get involved with the visual that is being presented, I think it will really make the entire speech and presentation stand out in their memory in the long run, because it is easier to remember things you've seen than things you have heard.
ReplyDelete